🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed ruling, the nation's top court cleared the way for Texas to implement a newly configured congressional district plan that is projected to include up to five new Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 ruling, released on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to set aside a district court's injunction that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing much confusion and disturbing the sensitive balance of power in elections, the order stated in explaining its action.

The district court had previously found that Texas had likely grouped voters based on their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the redistricting plan. It had mandated the state to employ the maps drawn after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

In a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's ruling. She stated that it undermined the work of the lower court, observing that its decision was actually authored by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order ensures that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a violation of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Fight

The court's action is part of a national battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican control. Ordinarily, map-drawing takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a chain reaction among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have responded with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State top lawyer praised the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures representation supportive of his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

Conversely, Democratic representatives decried the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major party campaign committee.

A leading Democratic leader said the court had once again shredded its credibility by upholding a race-based map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he concluded.